Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
How The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company stacks up
GT · against 361 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
12/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #305 of 362 · scores higher than 15% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score27 peers with a profitability score of 10–19, including GT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 12?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, return on invested capital and operating margin, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 98% of peers. Return on assets: -13.6% vs peer median 3.3%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 86% of peers. Return on invested capital: -1.3% vs peer median 7.3%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 69% of peers. Operating margin: 3.6% vs peer median 6.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 349 reported | -1.3% | 9.5% | 16% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 362 reported | 3.6% | 7.1% | 33% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 358 reported | -13.6% | 4.1% | 6% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 315 reported | -61.5% | 11.8% | 4% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 363 reported | 18.1% | 36.0% | 19% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 1 | 2.4B USD | 99 | 65 | |
| 1 | 11.5B USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 1 | 10.7B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 1 | 6.5B USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 299 | 44.1B USD | 13 | 35 | |
| 299 | 255M USD | 13 | 35 | |
| 299 | 442M USD | 13 | 33 | |
| 299 | 1.4B USD | 13 | 19 | |
| 305 | 1.3B USD | 12 | 22 | |
| 305 | 18.6B USD | 12 | 43 | |
| 305 | 165M USD | 12 | 17 | |
| 308 | 2.1B USD | 11 | 25 | |
| 309 | 656M USD | 10 | 22 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score