Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score
5 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including GS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 34?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its book yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼a higher price relative to book value (P/B): weaker than 86% of peers. Book yield: 47.0% vs peer median 79.5%
▼lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 61% of peers. Earnings yield: 8.0% vs peer median 7.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
GS
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Earnings yieldHigher is better · 23 reported
7.2%
7.1%
55%
60%
EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 3 reported
Not reported
11.0%
—
—
Context only
Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 12 reported
-15.9%
9.7%
0%
Context only
Book yieldHigher is better · 22 reported
40.4%
46.3%
43%
40%
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
