Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Granite Ridge Resources, Inc.
How Granite Ridge Resources, Inc. stacks up
GRNT · against 94 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
47/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #43 of 95 · scores higher than 55% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score12 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including GRNT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 69% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 4.7% vs peer median -1.3%
- Earnings per share turned from a profit to a loss. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 78% of peers. Revenue growth: 14.6% vs peer median 0.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GRNT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GRNT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 98 reported | 14.6% | -1.4% | 79% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 58 reported | 28.6% | -8.6% | 77% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 94 reported | 4.7% | -0.7% | 73% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GRNT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 2 | 4.6B CNY (≈$641M) | 97 | 48 | |
| 2 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 97 | 98 | |
| 4 | 7.5B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 95 | 38 | |
| 5 | 900M USD | 94 | 56 | |
| 38 | 344M USD | 54 | 28 | |
| 40 | 1.3B USD | 53 | 53 | |
| 41 | 4.8B CNY (≈$672M) | 51 | 31 | |
| 42 | 76.6B JPY (≈$521M) | 48 | 52 | |
| 43 | 674M USD | 47 | 45 | |
| 44 | 697M USD | 46 | 50 | |
| 45 | 809M USD | 45 | 39 | |
| 45 | 767M CAD (≈$560M) | 45 | 35 | |
| 47 | 83.2B JPY (≈$566M) | 44 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score