Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Garmin Ltd.
How Garmin Ltd. stacks up
GRMN · against 85 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
55/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #41 of 86 · scores higher than 51% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score12 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including GRMN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 55?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 4.6% vs peer median 4.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 3.1% vs peer median 2.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 64% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.6% vs peer median 2.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GRMN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GRMN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 86 reported | 3.6% | 2.9% | 58% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 84 reported | 4.6% | 4.9% | 46% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 67 reported | 3.1% | 3.0% | 52% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 82 reported | 17.2% | 15.0% | 56% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GRMN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.42T TWD (≈$44.0B) | 95 | 75 | |
| 2 | 3.89T JPY (≈$26.5B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 3 | 28.8B USD | 92 | 70 | |
| 3 | 35.5B USD | 92 | 80 | |
| 5 | 95.8B USD | 89 | 67 | |
| 38 | 28.3B USD | 56 | 42 | |
| 38 | 30.8B USD | 56 | 59 | |
| 41 | 932.5B TWD (≈$28.9B) | 55 | 47 | |
| 41 | 32.8B USD | 55 | 66 | |
| 41 | 52.3B USD | 55 | 74 | |
| 44 | 28.4B USD | 52 | 50 | |
| 44 | 47.7B USD | 52 | 58 | |
| 46 | 72.9B CAD (≈$53.2B) | 51 | 51 | |
| 47 | 45.7B USD | 50 | 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score