Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GRMN · against 85 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #10 of 86 · scores higher than 89% of peers · safety percentile 79
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)5 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including GRMN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GRMN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 85 reported | 0.03× | 0.35× | 87% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 84 reported | 0.87 | 1.20 | 72% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 85 reported | 3.03× | 1.70× | 87% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 91 | 75 | |
| 2 | 28.4B USD | 90 | 79 | |
| 3 | 11.47T JPY (≈$78.0B) | 89 | 62 | |
| 4 | 888.4B TWD (≈$27.5B) | 85 | 73 | |
| 5 | 26.8B USD | 83 | 85 | |
| 6 | 65.3B USD | 83 | 68 | |
| 7 | 32.8B USD | 81 | 70 | |
| 8 | 323.5B CNY (≈$45.3B) | 81 | 70 | |
| 9 | 27.0B USD | 80 | 55 | |
| 10 | 52.3B USD | 79 | 74 | |
| 11 | 48.3B USD | 77 | 65 | |
| 12 | 482.9B CNY (≈$67.6B) | 77 | 73 | |
| 13 | 3.89T INR (≈$46.7B) | 74 | 70 | |
| 14 | 54.1B USD | 72 | 26 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score