Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GPK · against 1,584 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #1,239 of 1,585 · scores higher than 22% of peers · safety percentile 22
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)159 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including GPK · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GPK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,521 reported | 1.76× | 0.50× | 13% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,556 reported | 0.67 | 0.56 | 42% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,545 reported | 1.38× | 1.48× | 45% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 271M MYR (≈$60M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 321M MYR (≈$71M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 2 | 297M MYR (≈$65M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 2 | 170M MYR (≈$37M) | 100 | 74 | |
| 5 | 61M MYR (≈$13M) | 100 | 29 | |
| 1,235 | 615.5B CLP (≈$677M) | 22 | 37 | |
| 1,236 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 20.3B TWD (≈$629M) |
| 22 |
| 48 |
| 1,237 | 433M USD | 22 | 43 |
| 1,238 | 3.5B THB (≈$98M) | 22 | 36 |
| 1,239 | 3.3B USD | 22 | 33 |
| 1,240 | 2.1B CNY (≈$289M) | 22 | 31 |
| 1,241 | 457M CAD (≈$334M) | 22 | 63 |
| 1,242 | 8.6B GBP (≈$11.1B) | 22 | 45 |
| 1,243 | 16.8B USD | 22 | 46 |