Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Graphic Packaging Holding Company
How Graphic Packaging Holding Company stacks up
GPK · against 327 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
62/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #129 of 328 · scores higher than 60% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score40 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including GPK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.6% vs peer median 6.1%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 63% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.8% vs peer median 4.4%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 72% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.1% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GPK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GPK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 328 reported | 5.8% | 5.5% | 55% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 335 reported | 12.9% | 9.4% | 74% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 135 reported | 5.6% | 5.9% | 47% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 331 reported | 96.6% | 44.4% | 83% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GPK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 3 | 248.4B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 4 | 25.5B HKD (≈$3.3B) | 97 | 83 | |
| 4 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 125 | 6.2B CAD (≈$4.5B) | 63 | 34 | |
| 125 | 81.8B THB (≈$2.3B) | 63 | 52 | |
| 125 | 3.0B AUD (≈$2.0B) | 63 | 45 | |
| 129 | 1.8B USD | 62 | 39 | |
| 129 | 3.3B USD | 62 | 33 | |
| 129 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 62 | 41 | |
| 129 | 4.4B USD | 62 | 45 | |
| 133 | 7.29T KRW (≈$5.2B) | 61 | 65 | |
| 133 | 2.4B GBP (≈$3.1B) | 61 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score