Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
BRSL · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #584 of 1,553 · scores higher than 62% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score155 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including BRSL · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | BRSL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 9.9% | 4.4% | 86% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 12.1% | 8.8% | 68% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | -123.9% | 6.1% | 1% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 46.6% | 57.2% | 42% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 584 | 94.0B JPY (≈$639M) | 62 | 72 | |
| 584 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 113.9B JPY (≈$775M) |
| 62 |
| 70 |
| 584 | 169M AUD (≈$112M) | 62 | 43 |
| 584 | 433M USD | 62 | 43 |
| 584 | 1.8B USD | 62 | 39 |
| 584 | 10.5B USD | 62 | 57 |
| 584 | 155.0B SEK (≈$15.5B) | 62 | 71 |
| 584 | 352M USD | 62 | 34 |
| 584 | 3.3B USD | 62 | 33 |