Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GPI · against 328 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #101 of 329 · scores higher than 68% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score40 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including GPI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | GPI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 328 reported | 9.0% | 5.5% | 83% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 335 reported | 11.8% | 9.5% | 66% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 133 reported | 5.3% | 6.0% | 43% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 330 reported | 94.4% | 44.6% | 82% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 3 | 248.4B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 4 | 25.5B HKD (≈$3.3B) | 97 | 83 | |
| 4 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 97 | 2.7B EUR (≈$3.0B) | 70 | 48 | |
| 97 | 34.5B ZAR (≈$1.9B) | 70 | 54 | |
| 101 | 21.6B CNY (≈$3.0B) | 69 | 65 | |
| 101 | 76.3B TWD (≈$2.4B) | 69 | 47 | |
| 101 | 3.2B USD | 69 | 42 | |
| 101 | 4.4B USD | 69 | 53 | |
| 101 | 4.1B GBP (≈$5.3B) | 69 | 70 | |
| 101 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 69 | 56 | |
| 107 | 767.7B JPY (≈$5.2B) | 68 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score