Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Genuine Parts Company
How Genuine Parts Company stacks up
GPC · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
24/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #291 of 356 · scores higher than 16% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score31 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including GPC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 24?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 100% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -95.9% vs peer median 4.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.1% vs peer median 4.3%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.5% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GPC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GPC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 5.5% | 5.9% | 48% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | -95.9% | 6.2% | 0% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | 3.1% | 4.1% | 45% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GPC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 289 | 5.1B USD | 25 | 19 | |
| 289 | 49.1B USD | 25 | 15 | |
| 291 | 352M USD | 24 | 34 | |
| 291 | 680M USD | 24 | 21 | |
| 291 | 17.1B USD | 24 | 32 | |
| 291 | 17.5B USD | 24 | 18 | |
| 291 | 45M USD | 24 | 26 | |
| 291 | 4.1B USD | 24 | 34 | |
| 291 | 7.9B USD | 24 | 26 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score