Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Canada Goose Holdings Inc.
How Canada Goose Holdings Inc. stacks up
GOOS · against 1,603 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Profitability
29/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,132 of 1,604 · scores higher than 29% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score160 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including GOOS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 29?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its return on invested capital, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 99% of peers. Return on invested capital: -132.1% vs peer median 7.3%
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 5.8% vs peer median 6.4%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 85% of peers. Return on assets: 7.9% vs peer median 3.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GOOS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GOOS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,510 reported | -132.1% | 7.3% | 1% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,601 reported | 5.8% | 6.4% | 46% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,528 reported | 7.9% | 3.3% | 85% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,476 reported | 12.2% | 7.7% | 67% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,613 reported | 69.7% | 30.2% | 94% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GOOS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 100 | 96 | |
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 3 | 880.5B TWD (≈$27.3B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 3 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1,132 | 681.8B JPY (≈$4.6B) | 29 | 50 | |
| 1,132 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score