Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GME · against 158 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #26 of 159 · scores higher than 84% of peers · safety percentile 77
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)15 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including GME · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GME | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 156 reported | 0.71× | 0.70× | 50% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 159 reported | 1.62 | 0.91 | 9% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 156 reported | 8.72× | 1.49× | 97% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.75T JPY (≈$11.9B) | 97 | 51 | |
| 2 | 9.5B CHF (≈$10.9B) | 96 | 37 | |
| 3 | 112.0B CNY (≈$15.7B) | 95 | 53 | |
| 4 | 7.8B EUR (≈$8.6B) | 94 | 61 | |
| 5 | 16.1B USD | 93 | 66 | |
| 22 | 147.3B MXN (≈$8.0B) | 79 | 73 | |
| 23 | 1.09T JPY (≈$7.4B) | 78 | 71 | |
| 24 | 50.6B HKD (≈$6.5B) | 78 | 84 | |
| 25 | 151.9B HKD (≈$19.4B) | 77 | 77 | |
| 26 | 12.2B USD | 77 | 60 | |
| 27 | 155.0B SEK (≈$15.5B) | 73 | 71 | |
| 27 | 271.2B MXN (≈$14.6B) | 73 | 70 | |
| 29 | 13.8B USD | 73 | 70 | |
| 30 | 10.9B USD | 73 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score