Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GM · against 39 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #40 of 40 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score4 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including GM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | GM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 40 reported | -1.1% | 8.1% | 8% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 35 reported | -53.4% | 4.2% | 0% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 40 reported | 3.0% | 10.0% | 13% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 3 | 73.8B EUR (≈$81.2B) | 98 | 58 | |
| 4 | 4.05T INR (≈$48.6B) | 97 | 53 | |
| 5 | 79.4B USD | 94 | 46 | |
| 36 | 57.2B USD | 30 | 50 | |
| 37 | 78.5B EUR (≈$86.4B) | 26 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 38 | 49.1B USD | 25 | 15 |
| 39 | 40.6B USD | 23 | 61 |
| 40 | 77.5B USD | 21 | 26 |