Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Corning Incorporated
How Corning Incorporated stacks up
GLW · against 45 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
40/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #28 of 46 · scores higher than 36% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score10 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including GLW · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 40?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 1.7% vs peer median 2.2%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 3.5% vs peer median 4.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.2% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GLW, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GLW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 47 reported | 1.7% | 2.4% | 28% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 46 reported | 3.5% | 4.1% | 47% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 39 reported | 2.2% | 2.3% | 45% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 46 reported | 11.0% | 11.6% | 47% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GLW| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 95.8B USD | 89 | 67 | |
| 2 | 3.46T TWD (≈$107.1B) | 81 | 58 | |
| 2 | 155.8B USD | 81 | 63 | |
| 2 | 164.9B USD | 81 | 89 | |
| 5 | 92.1B USD | 77 | 68 | |
| 23 | 207.6B USD | 46 | 61 | |
| 25 | 94.0B USD | 42 | 61 | |
| 25 | 137.9B USD | 42 | 59 | |
| 27 | 203.4B USD | 41 | 61 | |
| 28 | 108.7B USD | 40 | 55 | |
| 28 | 181.7B EUR (≈$199.8B) | 40 | 56 | |
| 28 | 203.8B USD | 40 | 56 | |
| 31 | 112.9B USD | 39 | 49 | |
| 32 | 88.7B USD | 37 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score