Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.
How Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. stacks up
GLPI · against 88 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Growth
82/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #19 of 89 · scores higher than 77% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score9 peers with a growth score of 80–89, including GLPI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 82?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 11.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.2% vs peer median 3.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.8% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GLPI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GLPI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 90 reported | 5.8% | 5.4% | 52% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 72 reported | 2.8% | 14.7% | 28% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 88 reported | 6.2% | 7.4% | 46% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GLPI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 7.60T CLP (≈$8.4B) | 99 | 86 | |
| 3 | 11.7B USD | 98 | 49 | |
| 3 | 13.7B USD | 98 | 70 | |
| 5 | 7.2B USD | 97 | 34 | |
| 15 | 12.0B USD | 88 | 61 | |
| 16 | 7.2B EUR (≈$7.9B) | 85 | 63 | |
| 17 | 5.9B USD | 83 | 74 | |
| 17 | 7.3B USD | 83 | 58 | |
| 19 | 11.7B USD | 82 | 80 | |
| 19 | 502.9B INR (≈$6.0B) | 82 | 39 | |
| 19 | 4.5B GBP (≈$5.9B) | 82 | 64 | |
| 22 | 1.06T INR (≈$12.7B) | 81 | 74 | |
| 23 | 732.8B INR (≈$8.8B) | 78 | 69 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score