Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GLP · against 112 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #109 of 113 · scores higher than 4% of peers · safety percentile 4
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)15 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including GLP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GLP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 109 reported | 2.68× | 0.52× | 8% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 111 reported | 1.11 | 0.48 | 15% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 112 reported | 1.19× | 1.45× | 41% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 2 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 3 | 1.3B GBP (≈$1.7B) | 99 | ||
| 4 | 1.2B USD | 98 | 68 | |
| 5 | 10.1B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 97 | 50 | |
| 105 | 1.2B USD | 6 | 59 | |
| 106 | 2.0B USD | 6 | 15 | |
| 107 | 759M USD | 4 | 7 | |
| 108 | 12.5B HKD (≈$1.6B) | 4 | 34 | |
| 109 | 1.5B USD | 4 | 49 | |
| 110 | 1.8B USD | 3 | 46 | |
| 111 | 1.5B USD | 2 | 12 | |
| 112 | 1.8B USD | 1 | 4 | |
| 113 | 4.4B AUD (≈$2.9B) | 1 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score