Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Liberty Capital Corporation
How Liberty Capital Corporation stacks up
GLIBA · against 142 other Communication Services companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
18/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #126 of 143 · scores higher than 12% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score12 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including GLIBA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 18?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -37.1% vs peer median 2.9%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 62% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 5.4% vs peer median 7.4%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -11.3% vs peer median 8.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GLIBA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GLIBA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 140 reported | -48.9% | 3.0% | 11% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 144 reported | 20.1% | 9.3% | 87% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 131 reported | Not reported | 7.5% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 144 reported | 191.6% | 45.9% | 90% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GLIBA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 2 | 4.5B USD | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 743M USD | 97 | 67 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 97 | 81 | |
| 5 | 393M USD | 96 | 78 | |
| 122 | 472M USD | 21 | 28 | |
| 122 | 240M USD | 21 | 21 | |
| 124 | 9.5B USD | 20 | 31 | |
| 125 | 10.9B USD | 19 | 31 | |
| 126 | 905M USD | 18 | 33 | |
| 127 | 32.5B USD | 17 | 28 | |
| 128 | 1.8B USD | 16 | 30 | |
| 129 | 5.2B USD | 15 | ||
| 130 | 7.6B USD | 13 | 38 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score