Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
How Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. stacks up
GILT · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Valuation
78/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #360 of 1,667 · scores higher than 78% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score167 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including GILT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 78?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 74% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 1.7% vs peer median 2.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 83% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.8% vs peer median 2.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 89% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.9% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GILT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GILT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | 6.0% | 2.3% | 83% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 13.3% | 4.3% | 89% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | -0.6% | 2.7% | 26% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | 95.9% | 33.4% | 90% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GILT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 360 | 259M USD | 78 | 82 | |
| 360 | 302M USD | 78 | 47 | |
| 360 | 163M NZD (≈$98M) | 78 | 39 | |
| 360 | 866M EUR (≈$952M) | 78 | 73 | |
| 360 | 568M USD | 78 | 66 | |
| 360 | 141.5B INR (≈$1.7B) | 78 | 74 | |
| 376 | 2.1B HKD (≈$268M) | 77 | 52 | |
| 376 | 81.2B TWD (≈$2.5B) | 77 | 67 | |
| 376 | 10.9B TWD (≈$337M) | 77 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score