Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GILD · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #1,247 of 1,373 · scores higher than 9% of peers · safety percentile 9
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)138 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including GILD · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GILD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 2.23× | 0.24× | 5% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 0.33 | 0.53 | 64% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 1.26× | 2.62× | 19% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 1,243 | 34.3B USD | 9 | 57 | |
| 1,244 | 2.2B USD | 9 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 32 |
| 1,245 | 336M USD | 9 | 43 |
| 1,246 | 3.0B USD | 9 | 35 |
| 1,247 | 207.7B USD | 9 | 18 |
| 1,248 | 505.4B USD | 9 | 53 |
| 1,249 | 464M USD | 9 | 53 |
| 1,250 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 9 | 44 |
| 1,251 | 513M USD | 9 | 31 |