Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GIL · against 219 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #142 of 220 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score38 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including GIL · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
| Metric | GIL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 217 reported | 3.2% | 5.0% | 26% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 223 reported | 9.2% | 9.1% | 52% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 118 reported | 6.9% | 6.3% | 56% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 219 reported | 44.4% | 34.1% | 59% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 3 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 5 | 5.3B CAD (≈$3.9B) | 96 | 71 | |
| 133 | 12.2B EUR (≈$13.4B) | 45 | 60 | |
| 133 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 4.6B GBP (≈$6.0B) |
| 45 |
| 42 |
| 140 | 46.7B CNY (≈$6.5B) | 44 | 68 |
| 140 | 20.0B SAR (≈$5.4B) | 44 | 65 |
| 142 | 7.5B USD | 43 | 48 |
| 142 | 73.9B BRL (≈$13.3B) | 43 | 58 |
| 144 | 34.9B CNY (≈$4.9B) | 42 | 53 |
| 144 | 17.6B SAR (≈$4.8B) | 42 | 68 |
| 144 | 4.7B USD | 42 | 52 |