Ranked #167 of 362 · scores higher than 54% of peers · safety percentile 30
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)
46 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including GIL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why “Higher relative risk”?
The measures below combine into a safety percentile of 30 among Consumer Cyclical companies. It is relative: 67 or more is lower relative risk, 33–66 moderate, below 33 higher.
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
▼more borrowing relative to shareholders' equity: weaker than 83% of peers. Debt / equity: 1.21× vs peer median 0.46×
▼a share price that has swung more with the market: weaker than 80% of peers. Beta: 1.08 vs peer median 0.63
▲more short-term assets to cover bills due within a year: stronger than 68% of peers. Current ratio: 2.11× vs peer median 1.48×
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GIL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
