Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GCO · against 1,584 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #1,097 of 1,585 · scores higher than 31% of peers · safety percentile 31
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)158 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including GCO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GCO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,521 reported | 1.05× | 0.50× | 27% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,556 reported | 1.81 | 0.56 | 4% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,545 reported | 1.58× | 1.48× | 55% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 271M MYR (≈$60M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 2 | 321M MYR (≈$71M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 2 | 297M MYR (≈$65M) | 100 | 48 | |
| 2 | 170M MYR (≈$37M) | 100 | 74 | |
| 5 | 61M MYR (≈$13M) | 100 | 29 | |
| 1,093 | 4.7B USD | 31 | 52 | |
| 1,094 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 3.4B CNY (≈$483M) |
| 31 |
| 12 |
| 1,095 | 459M USD | 31 | 38 |
| 1,096 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 31 | 30 |
| 1,097 | 395M USD | 31 | 59 |
| 1,098 | 5.1B USD | 31 | 46 |
| 1,099 | 1.4B AUD (≈$896M) | 31 | 51 |
| 1,100 | 7.0B USD | 31 | 46 |
| 1,101 | 10.5B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 31 | 59 |