Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Gildan Activewear Inc.
How Gildan Activewear Inc. stacks up
GIL · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
49/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #211 of 356 · scores higher than 39% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score38 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including GIL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 49?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger revenue growth, but weaker earnings per share growth than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 73% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -18.1% vs peer median 4.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.8% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 76% of peers. Revenue growth: 10.7% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GIL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GIL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 10.7% | 5.9% | 69% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | -18.1% | 6.2% | 27% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | 3.8% | 4.1% | 48% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GIL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 211 | 14.0B USD | 49 | 47 | |
| 211 | 433M USD | 49 | 43 | |
| 211 | 395M USD | 49 | 40 | |
| 211 | 763M USD | 49 | 19 | |
| 211 | 7.5B USD | 49 | 48 | |
| 211 | 1.5B USD | 49 | 44 | |
| 211 | 1.4B USD | 49 | 38 | |
| 218 | 8.6B USD | 48 | 55 | |
| 218 | 2.4B USD | 48 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score