Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Graham Holdings Company
How Graham Holdings Company stacks up
GHC · against 455 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
42/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #313 of 456 · scores higher than 31% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score54 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including GHC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 76% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -19.4% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.8% vs peer median 4.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 6.4% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GHC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GHC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 457 reported | 4.8% | 6.5% | 42% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 399 reported | -19.4% | 8.7% | 21% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 451 reported | 6.4% | 6.4% | 50% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GHC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 4.6B USD | 100 | 58 | |
| 4 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 99 | 73 | |
| 4 | 6.1B USD | 99 | 55 | |
| 307 | 11.4B AUD (≈$7.5B) | 43 | 39 | |
| 313 | 799.4B JPY (≈$5.4B) | 42 | 68 | |
| 313 | 26.3B CNY (≈$3.7B) | 42 | 45 | |
| 313 | 692.3B JPY (≈$4.7B) | 42 | 46 | |
| 313 | 5.1B USD | 42 | 54 | |
| 317 | 26.7B CNY (≈$3.7B) | 41 | 45 | |
| 317 | 20.6B CNY (≈$2.9B) | 41 | 25 | |
| 317 | 382.7B JPY (≈$2.6B) | 41 | 28 | |
| 317 | 8.6B USD | 41 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score