Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Greenfire Resources Ltd.
How Greenfire Resources Ltd. stacks up
GFR · against 386 other Energy companies
Valuation
12/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #339 of 387 · scores higher than 12% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score39 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including GFR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 12?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 88% of peers. EBITDA yield: 4.3% vs peer median 12.1%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 81% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 1.2% vs peer median 6.2%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 73% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.3% vs peer median 5.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GFR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GFR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 384 reported | Not reported | 5.8% | — | — | 30% |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 390 reported | 4.3% | 12.4% | 12% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 249 reported | -2.8% | 6.0% | 19% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 378 reported | Not reported | 60.0% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GFR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 2 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 517M CAD (≈$378M) | 99 | 47 | |
| 335 | 15.9B CAD (≈$11.6B) | 13 | 26 | |
| 339 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score