Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to GFL Environmental Inc.
How GFL Environmental Inc. stacks up
GFL · against 231 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
64/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #56 of 232 · scores higher than 74% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score31 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including GFL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 64?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, which is stronger than most Industrials peers.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 70% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 0.7% vs peer median 3.7%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 64% of peers. EBITDA yield: 5.0% vs peer median 6.9%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 95% of peers. Earnings yield: 16.0% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GFL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GFL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 220 reported | Not reported | 3.9% | — | — | 30% |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 232 reported | 5.0% | 6.9% | 26% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 118 reported | 0.9% | 3.7% | 14% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 217 reported | 31.1% | 25.8% | 58% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GFL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 2 | 21.8B EUR (≈$24.0B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 3 | 157.6B HKD (≈$20.2B) | 97 | 67 | |
| 3 | 91.3B HKD (≈$11.7B) | 97 | 73 | |
| 5 | 12.69T CLP (≈$14.0B) | 94 | 64 | |
| 51 | 2.97T JPY (≈$20.2B) | 65 | 37 | |
| 51 | 11.3B EUR (≈$12.4B) | 65 | 52 | |
| 51 | 9.3B USD | 65 | 47 | |
| 56 | 1.61T JPY (≈$11.0B) | 64 | 61 | |
| 56 | 16.5B USD | 64 | 57 | |
| 56 | 12.0B USD | 64 | 53 | |
| 56 | 15.1B USD | 64 | 57 | |
| 56 | 19.0B EUR (≈$20.9B) | 64 | 56 | |
| 61 | 1.83T JPY (≈$12.5B) | 63 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score