Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Griffon Corporation
How Griffon Corporation stacks up
GFF · against 477 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
58/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #216 of 478 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score72 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including GFF · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 58?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.9% vs peer median 3.8%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.4% vs peer median 6.9%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 68% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 6.4% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GFF, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GFF | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 472 reported | 4.5% | 4.4% | 52% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 482 reported | 8.6% | 7.8% | 57% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 200 reported | 5.9% | 4.1% | 69% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 472 reported | 2.8% | 41.6% | 1% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GFF| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 4 | 22.0B HKD (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 4 | 26.4B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 216 | 734.8B JPY (≈$5.0B) | 58 | 67 | |
| 216 | 33.7B CNY (≈$4.7B) | 58 | 77 | |
| 216 | 6.8B USD | 58 | 26 | |
| 216 | 3.9B USD | 58 | 71 | |
| 216 | 4.7B USD | 58 | 63 | |
| 216 | 45.8B DKK (≈$6.9B) | 58 | 42 | |
| 216 | 5.5B CHF (≈$6.3B) | 58 | 61 | |
| 216 | 2.5B USD | 58 | 55 | |
| 227 | 29.4B CNY (≈$4.1B) | 57 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score