Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GDOT · against 138 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Ranked #86 of 139 · scores higher than 38% of peers · safety percentile 41
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)15 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including GDOT · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker current ratio and beta than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GDOT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 118 reported | Not reported | 0.58× | — | — | 33% |
| BetaLower is better · 137 reported | 0.91 | 0.61 | 19% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 136 reported | Not reported | 2.15× | — | — | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.0B AUD (≈$674M) | 100 | ||
| 2 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 3 | 907M EUR (≈$998M) | 99 | ||
| 4 | 1.2B EUR (≈$1.3B) | 98 | 59 | |
| 5 | 566M AUD (≈$374M) | 97 | 84 | |
| 82 | 371M USD | 44 | ||
| 83 | 476M USD | 43 | ||
| 84 | 1.0B USD | 42 | 48 | |
| 85 | 528M USD | 41 | ||
| 86 | 709M USD | 41 | 32 | |
| 87 | 499M USD | 40 | ||
| 88 | 455M USD | 40 | ||
| 89 | 3.8B SEK (≈$376M) | 39 | 49 | |
| 90 | 827M USD | 39 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score