Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to The Gap, Inc.
How The Gap, Inc. stacks up
GAP · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
56/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #187 of 356 · scores higher than 47% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score36 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including GAP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 56?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger earnings per share growth, but weaker 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 67% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 0.5% vs peer median 4.3%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 61% of peers. Revenue growth: 1.1% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 82% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 48.2% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GAP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GAP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 1.1% | 5.9% | 27% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | 48.2% | 6.2% | 77% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | 0.5% | 4.1% | 33% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GAP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 182 | 5.5B USD | 57 | 36 | |
| 182 | 2.9B USD | 57 | 60 | |
| 182 | 3.7B USD | 57 | 41 | |
| 187 | 5.0B USD | 56 | 58 | |
| 187 | 7.7B USD | 56 | 68 | |
| 187 | 2.5B USD | 56 | 62 | |
| 187 | 193M USD | 56 | 34 | |
| 191 | 8.6B USD | 55 | 49 | |
| 191 | 5.5B USD | 55 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score