Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Gladstone Investment Corporatio
How Gladstone Investment Corporatio stacks up
GAIN · against 268 other Financial Services companies
Valuation
90/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #26 of 269 · scores higher than 90% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score29 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including GAIN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 90?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield, which is stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -7.2% vs peer median 6.1%
- EBITDA yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 95% of peers. Earnings yield: 28.2% vs peer median 5.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = GAIN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | GAIN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 410 reported | 28.2% | 5.6% | 95% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 206 reported | Not reported | 6.8% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 183 reported | -7.2% | 6.1% | 10% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 401 reported | 107.6% | 83.1% | 63% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around GAIN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 82M USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 3 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 22 | 5.3B GBP (≈$6.9B) | 92 | 79 | |
| 24 | 2.3B EUR (≈$2.5B) | 91 | 76 | |
| 24 | 405M USD | 91 | 57 | |
| 26 | 21.7B THB (≈$607M) | 90 | 52 | |
| 26 | 601M USD | 90 | 72 | |
| 26 | 157M USD | 90 | 79 | |
| 26 | 202M USD | 90 | 39 | |
| 30 | 3.1B AUD (≈$2.1B) | 89 | 62 | |
| 30 | 370M USD | 89 | 85 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score