Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to TechnipFMC plc
How TechnipFMC plc stacks up
FTI · against 42 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
79/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #13 of 43 · scores higher than 71% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score3 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including FTI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 79?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 70% of peers. Revenue growth: 9.9% vs peer median 0.5%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 76% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 35.3% vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 85% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 13.6% vs peer median -1.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FTI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FTI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 43 reported | 9.9% | -0.5% | 67% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 40 reported | 35.3% | 8.1% | 69% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 43 reported | 13.6% | -4.7% | 90% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FTI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20.8B USD | 98 | 83 | |
| 2 | 15.9B USD | 97 | 59 | |
| 3 | 31.6B USD | 96 | 56 | |
| 4 | 33.9B USD | 91 | 71 | |
| 4 | 20.1B USD | 91 | 65 | |
| 9 | 20.2B USD | 84 | 75 | |
| 9 | 113.8B BRL (≈$20.5B) | 84 | 65 | |
| 11 | 22.6B CAD (≈$16.5B) | 83 | 66 | |
| 12 | 22.9B USD | 81 | 72 | |
| 13 | 26.0B USD | 79 | 63 | |
| 14 | 1.29T INR (≈$15.5B) | 75 | 56 | |
| 14 | 18.1B USD | 75 | 53 | |
| 16 | 30.5B USD | 62 | 57 | |
| 17 | 18.4B USD | 60 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score