Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FSLY · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #306 of 1,698 · scores higher than 82% of peers · safety percentile 82
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including FSLY · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its beta and current ratio, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | FSLY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.40× | 0.26× | 40% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 0.31 | 0.84 | 86% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 3.36× | 1.83× | 80% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 302 | 4.2B SGD (≈$3.2B) | 82 | 59 | |
| 303 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 5.6B CNY (≈$789M) |
| 82 |
| 28 |
| 304 | 5.7B CNY (≈$804M) | 82 | 24 |
| 305 | 17.4B TWD (≈$539M) | 82 | 76 |
| 306 | 3.4B USD | 82 | 46 |
| 307 | 475.2B JPY (≈$3.2B) | 82 | 78 |
| 308 | 2.4B USD | 82 | 43 |
| 309 | 19.8B CNY (≈$2.8B) | 82 | 32 |
| 310 | 71.3B KRW (≈$51M) | 82 | 47 |