Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FRPT · against 160 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #41 of 161 · scores higher than 75% of peers · safety percentile 78
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)28 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including FRPT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | FRPT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 158 reported | 0.40× | 0.32× | 45% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 160 reported | 1.78 | 0.35 | 1% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 156 reported | 6.05× | 1.74× | 97% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 2 | 3.1B USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 3 | 2.74T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 49 | |
| 4 | 29.8B HKD (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 5 | 398.9B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 98 | 77 | |
| 37 | 235.8B INR (≈$2.8B) | 79 | 67 | |
| 38 | 629.6B JPY (≈$4.3B) | 79 | 56 | |
| 39 | 30.7B BRL (≈$5.5B) | 79 | 76 | |
| 39 | 5.5B USD | 79 | 84 | |
| 41 | 3.3B USD | 78 | 71 | |
| 42 | 19.3B CNY (≈$2.7B) | 78 | 67 | |
| 43 | 2.6B EUR (≈$2.8B) | 77 | 58 | |
| 44 | 613.1B JPY (≈$4.2B) | 77 | 71 | |
| 45 | 270.6B INR (≈$3.2B) | 76 | 72 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score