Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to FRP Holdings, Inc.
How FRP Holdings, Inc. stacks up
FRPH · against 198 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Growth
30/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #128 of 199 · scores higher than 33% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score25 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including FRPH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 30?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- Earnings per share turned from a profit to a loss. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 11.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.8% vs peer median 3.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.5% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FRPH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FRPH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 202 reported | 2.5% | 1.5% | 53% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 107 reported | -47.1% | 2.5% | 15% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 198 reported | 2.8% | 2.3% | 52% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FRPH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B CNY (≈$440M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 1 | 71.4B JPY (≈$486M) | 99 | 73 | |
| 1 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 1 | 2.4B BRL (≈$428M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 98 | 55 | |
| 128 | 2.1B HKD (≈$274M) | 30 | 41 | |
| 128 | 1.4B HKD (≈$181M) | 30 | 77 | |
| 128 | 9.62T IDR (≈$596M) | 30 | 67 | |
| 128 | 667M USD | 30 | 59 | |
| 128 | 354M USD | 30 | 41 | |
| 134 | 201M GBP (≈$261M) | 29 | 53 | |
| 134 | 681M USD | 29 | 52 | |
| 134 | 3.96T IDR (≈$246M) | 29 | 68 | |
| 137 | 374M SGD (≈$284M) | 27 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score