Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to FRP Holdings, Inc.
How FRP Holdings, Inc. stacks up
FRPH · against 179 other Real Estate companies listed in US-listed
Growth
30/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #147 of 180 · scores higher than 17% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score21 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including FRPH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 30?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- Earnings per share turned from a profit to a loss. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 11.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.8% vs peer median 3.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.5% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FRPH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FRPH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 182 reported | 2.5% | 5.9% | 34% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 133 reported | -47.1% | 13.9% | 14% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 174 reported | 2.8% | 4.8% | 40% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FRPH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 3 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 4 | 11.7B USD | 98 | 49 | |
| 4 | 34.7B USD | 98 | 45 | |
| 144 | 6.7B USD | 32 | 28 | |
| 145 | 1.2B USD | 31 | 29 | |
| 145 | 804M USD | 31 | 35 | |
| 147 | 667M USD | 30 | 59 | |
| 147 | 354M USD | 30 | 41 | |
| 147 | 3.6B USD | 30 | 33 | |
| 150 | 681M USD | 29 | 52 | |
| 151 | 4.2B USD | 28 | 18 | |
| 151 | 1.5B USD | 28 | 72 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score