Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc.
How First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. stacks up
FR · against 118 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
44/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #73 of 119 · scores higher than 39% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score17 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including FR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 44?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 6.0% vs peer median 6.5%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.0% vs peer median 5.3%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.3% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 123 reported | 5.0% | 4.4% | 57% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 115 reported | 5.3% | 5.6% | 39% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 67 reported | 6.0% | 5.0% | 58% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 124 reported | 38.1% | 80.1% | 19% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.3B USD | 93 | 94 | |
| 2 | 1.10T JPY (≈$7.5B) | 90 | 82 | |
| 3 | 10.1B USD | 87 | 53 | |
| 4 | 880.1B JPY (≈$6.0B) | 84 | 64 | |
| 4 | 135.9B MXN (≈$7.3B) | 84 | 76 | |
| 66 | 9.8B AUD (≈$6.5B) | 47 | 50 | |
| 70 | 7.4B USD | 46 | 53 | |
| 71 | 5.4B CAD (≈$3.9B) | 45 | 46 | |
| 71 | 14.8B USD | 45 | 51 | |
| 73 | 7.5B USD | 44 | 61 | |
| 74 | 5.0B GBP (≈$6.5B) | 42 | 40 | |
| 74 | 1.06T INR (≈$12.7B) | 42 | 74 | |
| 74 | 5.6B USD | 42 | 56 | |
| 74 | 4.5B USD | 42 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score