Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FPI · against 215 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Ranked #117 of 216 · scores higher than 46% of peers · safety percentile 59
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)18 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including FPI · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | FPI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 214 reported | 0.48× | 0.78× | 63% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 212 reported | 0.70 | 0.58 | 38% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 215 reported | 1.02× | 1.60× | 26% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 2 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 3 | 1.8B HKD (≈$225M) | 99 | 30 | |
| 4 | 354M USD | 97 | 41 | |
| 5 | 3.0B CNY (≈$427M) | 97 | 61 | |
| 113 | 310M USD | 61 | 72 | |
| 114 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 391M EUR (≈$430M) |
| 60 |
| 69 |
| 115 | 562M EUR (≈$618M) | 60 | 38 |
| 116 | 540M SGD (≈$410M) | 60 | 77 |
| 117 | 384M USD | 59 | 43 |
| 118 | 2.5B MYR (≈$545M) | 59 | 47 |
| 119 | 1.1B NZD (≈$669M) | 57 | 62 |
| 120 | 913M NZD (≈$548M) | 57 | 57 |
| 121 | 1.8B BRL (≈$315M) | 57 | 38 |