Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Funko, Inc.
How Funko, Inc. stacks up
FNKO · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
62/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #100 of 356 · scores higher than 71% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score46 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including FNKO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -0.6% vs peer median 4.4%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 7.5% vs peer median 6.1%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 16.2% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FNKO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FNKO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | -0.5% | 4.3% | 20% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 10.4% | 8.4% | 67% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 325 reported | 7.7% | 5.3% | 65% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 53.4% | 35.8% | 62% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FNKO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 2 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 4 | 395M USD | 96 | 59 | |
| 4 | 114.1B USD | 96 | 91 | |
| 97 | 611M USD | 63 | 37 | |
| 100 | 433M USD | 62 | 43 | |
| 100 | 1.8B USD | 62 | 39 | |
| 100 | 10.5B USD | 62 | 57 | |
| 100 | 352M USD | 62 | 34 | |
| 100 | 3.3B USD | 62 | 33 | |
| 100 | 4.4B USD | 62 | 45 | |
| 106 | 390M USD | 61 | 59 | |
| 106 | 8.0B USD | 61 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score