Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.
How Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. stacks up
FND · against 285 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
46/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #189 of 286 · scores higher than 33% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score36 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including FND · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 46?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.3% vs peer median 4.3%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.4% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 11.2% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FND, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FND | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 286 reported | 2.4% | 5.5% | 32% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 252 reported | 11.2% | 7.8% | 55% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 284 reported | 2.3% | 5.5% | 29% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FND| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 2 | 27.1B CNY (≈$3.8B) | 99 | 35 | |
| 2 | 272.3B INR (≈$3.3B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 9.3B USD | 99 | 43 | |
| 5 | 17.6B SAR (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 68 | |
| 185 | 4.0B USD | 47 | 64 | |
| 185 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 47 | 49 | |
| 185 | 4.4B USD | 47 | 45 | |
| 189 | 3.7B USD | 46 | 66 | |
| 189 | 5.1B USD | 46 | 46 | |
| 189 | 5.4B AUD (≈$3.6B) | 46 | 58 | |
| 189 | 4.5B GBP (≈$5.8B) | 46 | 55 | |
| 189 | 397.3B INR (≈$4.8B) | 46 | 59 | |
| 194 | 37.4B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 45 | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score