Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FMS · against 1,335 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #569 of 1,336 · scores higher than 57% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score134 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including FMS · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
| Metric | FMS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,226 reported | 6.4% | 4.7% | 56% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,251 reported | 9.3% | 7.1% | 57% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,315 reported | 3.2% | 1.7% | 61% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,252 reported | 8.5% | 3.2% | 67% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,394 reported | 26.4% | 45.9% | 29% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 100 | |
| 1 | 321.5B INR (≈$3.9B) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 174.8B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 97.3B INR (≈$1.2B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 5 | 12.3B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 99 | 85 | |
| 569 | 3.6B HKD (≈$463M) | 57 | 61 | |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 569 |
| 9.9B CNY (≈$1.4B) |
| 57 |
| 50 |
| 569 | 13.9B SEK (≈$1.4B) | 57 | 48 |
| 569 | 3.1B BRL (≈$560M) | 57 | 39 |
| 569 | 11.6B USD | 57 | 58 |
| 569 | 468M EUR (≈$514M) | 57 | 57 |
| 569 | 4.3B USD | 57 | 54 |
| 569 | 133.4B BRL (≈$24.0B) | 57 | 49 |
| 582 | 200.2B KRW (≈$144M) | 56 | 62 |