Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Flywire Corporation
How Flywire Corporation stacks up
FLYW · against 444 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
50/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #217 of 445 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score54 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including FLYW · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 50?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker earnings yield than most Technology peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 61% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.5% vs peer median 2.2%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 3.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 77% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 7.1% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FLYW, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FLYW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 439 reported | 1.4% | 2.4% | 36% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 449 reported | 3.1% | 4.5% | 39% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 180 reported | 6.6% | 3.3% | 74% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 441 reported | 35.1% | 30.5% | 60% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FLYW| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 27.5B HKD (≈$3.5B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 3 | 16.7B HKD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 3 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 98 | 94 | |
| 210 | 4.5B USD | 51 | 60 | |
| 217 | 47.6B TWD (≈$1.5B) | 50 | 28 | |
| 217 | 22.9B HKD (≈$2.9B) | 50 | 68 | |
| 217 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 50 | 58 | |
| 217 | 2.3B USD | 50 | 60 | |
| 217 | 1.9B USD | 50 | 29 | |
| 217 | 1.5B GBP (≈$1.9B) | 50 | 64 | |
| 217 | 1.3B CHF (≈$1.5B) | 50 | 69 | |
| 224 | 14.2B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 49 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score