Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Flowserve Corporation
How Flowserve Corporation stacks up
FLS · against 308 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
53/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #187 of 309 · scores higher than 39% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score45 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including FLS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.A mix: stronger earnings per share growth, but weaker revenue growth than most Industrials peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 68% of peers. Revenue growth: -0.3% vs peer median 4.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 74% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 31.0% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FLS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FLS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 309 reported | -0.3% | 6.5% | 17% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 281 reported | 31.0% | 11.1% | 74% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 306 reported | 5.3% | 6.7% | 45% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FLS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 3 | 6.1B USD | 99 | 55 | |
| 3 | 1.22T INR (≈$14.6B) | 99 | 72 | |
| 3 | 12.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 182 | 85.4B SEK (≈$8.5B) | 54 | 50 | |
| 182 | 11.2B USD | 54 | 55 | |
| 182 | 15.6B USD | 54 | 50 | |
| 182 | 12.0B USD | 54 | 48 | |
| 187 | 10.3B USD | 53 | 44 | |
| 187 | 4.0B GBP (≈$5.2B) | 53 | 63 | |
| 189 | 83.5B CNY (≈$11.7B) | 52 | 55 | |
| 189 | 2.02T JPY (≈$13.8B) | 52 | 27 | |
| 189 | 8.7B EUR (≈$9.6B) | 52 | 55 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score