Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Fluence Energy, Inc.
How Fluence Energy, Inc. stacks up
FLNC · against 357 other Utilities companies
Profitability
1/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #350 of 358 · scores higher than 1% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score34 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including FLNC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 1?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Mainly because of its return on invested capital, operating margin and return on assets, which are weaker than most Utilities peers.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 100% of peers. Return on invested capital: -259.8% vs peer median 5.2%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 97% of peers. Operating margin: -4.2% vs peer median 18.6%
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 97% of peers. Return on assets: -3.1% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FLNC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FLNC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 349 reported | -259.8% | 5.2% | 0% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 353 reported | -4.2% | 18.6% | 3% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 345 reported | -3.1% | 2.7% | 3% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 342 reported | -23.5% | 8.1% | 2% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 361 reported | 9.4% | 35.5% | 6% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FLNC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B BRL (≈$561M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 1 | 1.62T CLP (≈$1.8B) | 100 | 56 | |
| 3 | 7.9B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 85 | |
| 3 | 15.9B BRL (≈$2.9B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 3 | 15.5B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 346 | 213M THB (≈$6M) | 3 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score