Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FLGT · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #291 of 1,373 · scores higher than 79% of peers · safety percentile 79
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)137 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including FLGT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | FLGT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.01× | 0.24× | 90% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 0.93 | 0.53 | 27% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 6.34× | 2.62× | 79% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 287 | 170.4B THB (≈$4.8B) | 79 | 70 | |
| 288 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 582M AUD (≈$384M) |
| 79 |
| 74 |
| 289 | 41.6B USD | 79 | 34 |
| 290 | 3.7B USD | 79 | 24 |
| 291 | 533M USD | 79 | 36 |
| 292 | 2.3B USD | 79 | 74 |
| 293 | 18.3B DKK (≈$2.7B) | 79 | 81 |
| 294 | 4.8B CNY (≈$677M) | 79 | 67 |
| 295 | 449M USD | 79 | 72 |