Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FLEX · against 118 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #102 of 119 · scores higher than 14% of peers · safety percentile 13
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)20 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including FLEX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | FLEX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 113 reported | 1.08× | 0.33× | 19% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 115 reported | 1.66 | 1.16 | 24% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 117 reported | 1.38× | 1.67× | 32% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.60T JPY (≈$17.7B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 23.2B USD | 97 | 65 | |
| 3 | 17.5B USD | 95 | 93 | |
| 4 | 18.4B USD | 94 | 56 | |
| 5 | 183.1B CNY (≈$25.6B) | 94 | 77 | |
| 98 | 72.9B CAD (≈$53.2B) | 15 | 51 | |
| 99 | 983.8B TWD (≈$30.5B) | 14 | 65 | |
| 100 | 48.4B USD | 14 | 36 | |
| 101 | 19.0B USD | 13 | 54 | |
| 102 | 32.5B USD | 13 | 43 | |
| 103 | 52.7B USD | 12 | 61 | |
| 104 | 20.1B USD | 12 | 68 | |
| 105 | 351.9B CNY (≈$49.3B) | 11 | 50 | |
| 106 | 1.28T TWD (≈$39.6B) | 10 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score