Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to National Beverage Corp.
How National Beverage Corp. stacks up
FIZZ · against 160 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Valuation
43/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #102 of 161 · scores higher than 36% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score19 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including FIZZ · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Defensive norm.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 62% of peers. EBITDA yield: 7.3% vs peer median 8.7%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 61% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 4.8% vs peer median 6.2%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.2% vs peer median 4.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FIZZ, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FIZZ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 156 reported | 5.1% | 5.0% | 52% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 161 reported | 7.3% | 9.7% | 31% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 60 reported | 4.8% | 6.8% | 36% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 151 reported | 11.0% | 49.0% | 7% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FIZZ| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29.73T IDR (≈$1.8B) | 98 | 60 | |
| 2 | 34.8B HKD (≈$4.5B) | 96 | 75 | |
| 2 | 57.07T IDR (≈$3.5B) | 96 | 75 | |
| 4 | 24.2B HKD (≈$3.1B) | 95 | 64 | |
| 5 | 355.7B JPY (≈$2.4B) | 94 | 70 | |
| 98 | 15.5B CNY (≈$2.2B) | 44 | 47 | |
| 98 | 5.3B USD | 44 | 71 | |
| 98 | 2.2B USD | 44 | 22 | |
| 102 | 17.1B SEK (≈$1.7B) | 43 | 58 | |
| 102 | 3.4B USD | 43 | 54 | |
| 104 | 60.6B SEK (≈$6.1B) | 42 | 43 | |
| 104 | 4.9B EUR (≈$5.4B) | 42 | 42 | |
| 104 | 2.4B USD | 42 | 25 | |
| 107 | 12.5B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 41 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score