Ranked #71 of 96 · scores higher than 24% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score
15 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including FITB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 22?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its earnings yield and book yield, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 78% of peers. Earnings yield: 4.7% vs peer median 7.9%
▼a higher price relative to book value (P/B): weaker than 67% of peers. Book yield: 69.2% vs peer median 79.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FITB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
FITB
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Earnings yieldHigher is better · 95 reported
5.5%
8.1%
19%
60%
EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 27 reported
Not reported
11.0%
—
—
Context only
Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 47 reported
5.9%
8.2%
41%
Context only
Book yieldHigher is better · 95 reported
63.6%
60.3%
57%
40%
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
