Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Fiserv, Inc.
How Fiserv, Inc. stacks up
FISV · against 84 other Miscellaneous companies
Growth
36/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #55 of 85 · scores higher than 36% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score9 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including FISV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 36?
Weighted metrics compared with all Miscellaneous companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Miscellaneous peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 67% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -15.3% vs peer median 12.6%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 64% of peers. Revenue growth: -1.2% vs peer median 5.8%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.2% vs peer median 3.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FISV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FISV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 88 reported | -1.2% | 5.8% | 36% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 46 reported | -15.3% | 12.6% | 33% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 79 reported | 4.2% | 3.4% | 55% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FISV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | ||
| 2 | 1.35T KRW (≈$975M) | 99 | ||
| 3 | 6.6B USD | 98 | ||
| 4 | 506M GBP (≈$658M) | 96 | ||
| 5 | 14.1B USD | 95 | ||
| 51 | 408.2B KRW (≈$294M) | 40 | ||
| 52 | 449.3B KRW (≈$324M) | 39 | ||
| 53 | Unavailable | 38 | ||
| 54 | 954.8B JPY (≈$6.5B) | 37 | 46 | |
| 55 | 31.1B USD | 36 | 60 | |
| 56 | 2.22T KRW (≈$1.6B) | 35 | ||
| 57 | Unavailable | 33 | 25 | |
| 58 | 22.9B INR (≈$275M) | 32 | ||
| 59 | Unavailable | 31 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score