Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FIG · against 223 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #32 of 224 · scores higher than 86% of peers · safety percentile 78
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)15 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including FIG · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | FIG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 215 reported | 0.05× | 0.33× | 82% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 213 reported | Not reported | 1.01 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 223 reported | 2.45× | 1.66× | 75% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 2 | 2.60T JPY (≈$17.7B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 3 | 9.1B USD | 98 | 87 | |
| 4 | 41.6B CNY (≈$5.8B) | 97 | 79 | |
| 5 | 17.5B USD | 95 | 93 | |
| 28 | 952.5B INR (≈$11.4B) | 81 | 72 | |
| 29 | 62.0B CNY (≈$8.7B) | 80 | 54 | |
| 30 | 9.6B USD | 79 | 73 | |
| 31 | 71.1B CNY (≈$10.0B) | 78 | 56 | |
| 32 | 11.2B USD | 78 | 42 | |
| 33 | 1.45T JPY (≈$9.9B) | 77 | 79 | |
| 34 | 1.37T JPY (≈$9.3B) | 77 | 48 | |
| 35 | 9.8B USD | 76 | 58 | |
| 36 | 42.7B CNY (≈$6.0B) | 75 | 81 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score