Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FHTX · against 124 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #57 of 125 · scores higher than 39% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score31 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including FHTX · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
| Metric | FHTX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 110 reported | -46.0% | -11.8% | 29% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 132 reported | 19624.4% | 0.4% | 100% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 91 reported | -66.6% | -15.7% | 13% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 114 reported | -64.8% | 67.5% | 3% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.1B HKD (≈$146M) | 99 | 72 | |
| 1 | 834M HKD (≈$107M) | 99 | 57 | |
| 1 | 1.4B HKD (≈$181M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 29.0B JPY (≈$197M) | 99 | 56 | |
| 1 | 592M ILS (≈$160M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 57 | 110M USD | 33 | 38 | |
| 57 | 213M USD | 33 | ||
| 57 | 109M USD | 33 | 47 | |
| 57 | 216M USD | 33 | 44 | |
| 57 | 126M USD | 33 | 32 | |
| 57 | 215M USD | 33 | 34 | |
| 57 | 239M USD | 33 | 38 | |
| 57 | 110M USD | 33 | 54 | |
| 57 | 117M USD | 33 | 40 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score